India › Income Tax Litigation

India · Income Tax Litigation

Income Tax Litigation Services in India: Assessments, Reassessment, Search and Appeals

Scrutiny and faceless assessments, reopening under sections 147 and 148, search and block assessments, penalties, first appeals, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and High Court appeals through counsel.

Overview

Most income tax appeals are decided on the record made before the Assessing Officer.

An income tax dispute in India starts with a notice and, if it is not settled, usually ends at the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The first appeal lies to the Commissioner (Appeals) within 30 days of the demand notice. The Tribunal appeal is due within two months from the end of the month in which the appellate order is received. A High Court appeal lies within 120 days, on a substantial question of law only. Stay of demand is normally granted on payment of 20% of the disputed tax.

◆Companies, promoters and families under scrutiny, reassessment or search assessment
◆Businesses with additions for cash deposits, unexplained credits, share capital or bogus purchases
◆Non-residents and foreign companies disputing withholding, treaty or permanent establishment positions
◆Taxpayers facing a large demand, recovery notices or bank attachment while an appeal is pending
What’s Included

From the first notice to the Tribunal, with one team on the file.

◆

Scrutiny and faceless assessments

Replies to notices under sections 142(1) and 143(2), with evidence placed on record in a form an appellate authority can rely on.

◆

Reassessment

Objections at the section 148A stage on the information, time limit and sanction, and defence of the reassessment itself.

◆

Search, survey and block assessments

Support after a search or survey, review of statements and seized material, and the block assessment that follows searches from 1 September 2024.

◆

Penalties

Defence of penalty notices for under-reporting and misreporting, and applications for immunity where they are worth making.

◆

First appeals and the Tribunal

Appeals to the Joint Commissioner (Appeals), Commissioner (Appeals) and the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, with paper books and written submissions.

◆

Stay and recovery

Stay applications, instalments and the lifting of bank attachments while the appeal is pending.

How We Work

How an income tax matter runs.

01

Limitation first

We fix every date: the time limit for the notice itself, the reply date and the appeal date.

02

Build the record

Reconciliations, confirmations and affidavits go in at the earliest forum that will take them.

03

Argue

Written submissions and hearings before the officer, the appellate authority and the Tribunal.

04

Protect cash

Stay of demand and attachment relief run alongside the appeal.

05

Close

Appeal effect orders, refunds with interest and a decision on any further appeal.

Why LexVerge

Chartered accountants who litigate the numbers.

Faceless AssessmentSection 148ABlock AssessmentCommissioner (Appeals)ITATDRPStay of DemandSection 270AHigh Court (through counsel)

The Tribunal is the last forum that decides facts, so we build the facts for it from the first reply.

FAQ

Income tax litigation, answered.

What is the time limit to appeal an income tax assessment order?
A first appeal to the Commissioner (Appeals) or Joint Commissioner (Appeals) must be filed within 30 days of the date the demand notice is served. An appeal to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal is due within two months from the end of the month in which the appellate order is communicated, and a High Court appeal within 120 days of receiving the Tribunal’s order. Delay can be condoned for sufficient cause.
Do I have to pay the demand while my appeal is pending?
Not in full. Under the CBDT’s instructions the Assessing Officer normally stays the demand on payment of 20% of the disputed amount while the first appeal is pending, and can accept less where the addition is contrary to a binding decision or the assessment is high-pitched. The Tribunal can also grant stay.
Which law applies to my case after 1 April 2026?
The Income-tax Act, 1961 continues to govern assessments, reassessments, penalties and appeals for tax years beginning before 1 April 2026, under the saving provision in section 536 of the Income-tax Act, 2025. The 2025 Act applies to tax year 2026-27 onwards. The appeal hierarchy is the same under both.
Can a reassessment notice be challenged?
Yes. A notice under section 148 can be challenged if the section 148A procedure was not followed, if it was issued after the time limit, if the required approval was not obtained, or if there was no information suggesting escaped income. Raise these objections at the show cause stage and again in appeal; a writ petition in the High Court is an option where the notice is without jurisdiction.
What happens after an income tax search?
For searches initiated from 1 September 2024, the undisclosed income of the block period is assessed in a block assessment, starting with a notice to file a return of the block period. Statements recorded during the search are evidence, so any error in them should be addressed promptly and in writing with supporting records.
What is the penalty for under-reporting income?
Under section 270A of the 1961 Act, now section 439 of the 2025 Act, the penalty is 50% of the tax on under-reported income and 200% where the under-reporting is a result of misreporting, such as suppressed facts or false entries. Penalty is not automatic; the notice must say which limb applies.
Can a chartered accountant represent me before the ITAT?
Yes. Chartered accountants are authorised representatives before income tax authorities, the Commissioner (Appeals) and the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. Appeals in the High Court and the Supreme Court are argued by advocates, whom we brief and instruct.
In detail

Income tax disputes: limitation, appeals and what to have ready

Assessment and reassessment: the dates that decide jurisdiction

Every assessment step has an outer time limit. A notice or order passed after it is invalid whatever its merits, so limitation is the first thing we check. Notices for tax years up to 2025-26 follow the 1961 Act; the 2025 Act sections in the third column apply from tax year 2026-27, where section 282 sets longer reopening limits of four and six years.

Step1961 Act2025 ActTime limit
Scrutiny notice143(2)270(8)Within three months from the end of the financial year in which the return was filed
Scrutiny assessment order143(3), faceless under 144B270(10), faceless under 273Generally 12 months from the end of the assessment year (old Act)
Show cause before reopening148A281Old Act, notices from 1 September 2024: 3 years from the end of the assessment year, or 5 years where escaped income is Rs 50 lakh or more
Reassessment notice1482803 years and 3 months, or 5 years and 3 months where escaped income is Rs 50 lakh or more
Reassessment order147, limitation 153279, limitation 286Old Act: 12 months from the end of the financial year in which the section 148 notice was served

The appeal ladder

Forum1961 Act2025 ActTime to appealWhat it decides
Commissioner (Appeals) or Joint Commissioner (Appeals)246 and 246A, limitation 249356 to 35830 days from service of the demand noticeFacts and law; additional evidence only with permission
Dispute Resolution Panel (eligible foreign companies and transfer pricing cases)144CNot listed here30 days from the draft orderObjections to the draft order; no demand until the final order
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal253362Two months from the end of the month in which the order is communicatedThe last forum that decides facts
High Court260A365120 days from receipt of the Tribunal’s orderSubstantial questions of law only
Supreme Court261367On a certificate or by special leaveQuestions of law of general importance

A reopening starts with a show cause notice, and the reply can end the matter there: see how to reply to a section 148A notice.

Direct tax litigation and income tax dispute resolution

Direct tax litigation covers every stage of a contested income tax matter, from the reply to a notice through assessment, first appeal and the Tribunal. Not every dispute has to be fought through that ladder. Income tax dispute resolution can also mean rectifying an error, seeking revision, or using the Dispute Resolution Committee or the Dispute Resolution Panel where the case qualifies.

Search, survey and block assessment

A search under section 132 (section 247 of the 2025 Act) or a survey under section 133A (section 253) is followed by the most demanding assessments in the system. For searches initiated from 1 September 2024 the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2024 brought back a block assessment of undisclosed income for the block period, with its own return, its own rate and its own penalty. Three things matter most in the weeks after a search: a careful review of every statement recorded, an inventory of seized material and the explanation each item needs, and early work on the source of every asset found.

Additions we defend most often

  • Cash deposits and unexplained credits treated as income under sections 68 and 69A, including demonetisation-period deposits
  • Share capital and premium from investors whose identity, creditworthiness or genuineness is questioned
  • Purchases treated as bogus on the strength of a third party’s statement
  • Disallowance of expenses for want of tax deduction at source, including payments to non-residents
  • Transfer pricing adjustments and the corresponding secondary adjustment
  • Penalties for under-reporting and misreporting that follow these additions

Stay of demand and recovery

A demand becomes payable 30 days after the demand notice. Filing an appeal does not by itself stop recovery. Apply for stay to the Assessing Officer, with the appeal filed and the grounds attached; the CBDT’s instructions provide for stay on payment of 20% of the disputed demand, with a lower amount in deserving cases. If stay is refused, the Principal Commissioner can be approached, and the Tribunal can grant stay once a second appeal is pending. A bank attachment can often be lifted within days once stay is in place.

Settling instead of fighting

Some disputes are better closed than litigated. The Dispute Resolution Committee route (section 245MA, now section 379) is open to smaller taxpayers whose returned income is up to Rs 50 lakh and where the variation in dispute is up to Rs 10 lakh, subject to exclusions. Whether to settle depends on the strength of the facts, the interest and penalty at stake if the appeal fails, and the effect of the issue on later years.

Who appears where

Chartered accountants and advocates can both represent you before the Assessing Officer, the Commissioner (Appeals), the Dispute Resolution Panel and the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. High Court appeals, writ petitions and criminal prosecutions under the Act need an advocate. LexVerge takes matters to the Tribunal itself and briefs counsel for the courts, staying on the file so the facts are not lost at the handover. Our guide to choosing a tax litigator explains the split.

Prepared by the LexVerge editorial team and reviewed by Vijay Dhawan, Managing Partner, on 11 October 2026. Facts checked against the Acts, rules, regulations and judgments cited on this page on 11 October 2026. General information, not legal advice: deadlines run from the date of your notice or order, so confirm them for your matter.

India · LexVerge

Send us the order or the notice.

A partner will read it, fix the limitation dates and give you a view on the merits and the exposure.

Speak with a Partner →